A routine field update with a cited source.
Proceeds, logged with its source.
None, sampled in review.

Agentic workflows that give your people rich insight they can trust.
Agents read the file, check it against the rules and draft the change. Your people make the call. Every step points back to its source, and nothing is written until someone signs off.
Published work in mortgage lending, private credit and field service.
Each result below comes from the client's published case study.
Multi-tenant conversation agentA Vertex AI conversation agent gives field teams real-time insight and support.Read the story
1 copilotOne copilot reviews documents across every loan product.Read the story Figures as published in each client's case study.
Speed it up and we lose the record. Keep the record and we lose the speed.
The calls that move money run on documents: loan files, credit agreements, amendments, service records. The usual structure forces a choice. Read everything by hand, and decisions slow as volume grows. Speed them up, and the record of why a number changed gets thin.
The agent does the reading, so your people start from the facts, each one cited, instead of from a pile of files. We've seen that choice disappear when approval is built into the workflow rather than added after it. The agent reads and drafts. A person decides. The guardrails sit in the platform, so they hold on every run, not only on the runs someone checks.
Files wait in a queue for a specialist to read them.
Speed has to come with a record of every step.
Audit and risk need the source behind every change.
Oversight is the condition for going live.
Read a credit agreement. Summarize a file. Flag a payment.
tied to an outcome before anything is built
Time to decision. Cost per file. Changes reworked. Losses avoided.
Agreements, amendments, files and payments come in.
The agent pulls out the terms that matter and cites the clause each one came from.
A person approves or rejects the change.
Only the approved change reaches the system of record.
cited clause
The agent reads and drafts. A person approves. They never swap roles.
Claude, Vertex AI, Dialogflow CX, directed retrieval.
Every meaningful change an agent proposes triggers the right approval, with the context the approver needs to decide quickly. Low-risk work moves on its own. Higher-risk work goes to an accountable person. Every change leaves a trace.
Illustrative
Proceeds, logged with its source.
None, sampled in review.
Held for approval with the cited clause attached.
The reviewer who owns the record.
Stopped and routed with full context.
The decision owner.
Time-boxed exception logged against the control.
Risk and compliance.
Guardrails are enforced on every run, not remembered by people.
Every draft, approval and write is logged and mapped to the control it satisfies.
Risk and control owners set the guardrails before the first experiment, so they can say yes early.
Every production release carries evaluation results and a controls record.
Loan decisions moved faster, and every loan-book change traced and approved.
ProofMaxwell · TIMIA CapitalAnswers on technicians and operations, in the conversation.
ProofZinierSomething else on your mind? Ask us directly
No. The agent reads and drafts. A person approves every change before it is written.
Yes. Each draft points to the clause or document it came from.
The right one for each step, chosen per decision and swappable without rebuilding the workflow.
Any decision that runs on documents: lending, credit, claims, service and operations. Our published work is in lending, private credit and field service.
Tell us the decision, the documents behind it and who signs off. We will show you where the agent drafts and where your people approve.